A fine critical review - measured, meticulous and accessible in its analysis and rejoinders. Along the way, Curry alludes to a question posed by Shermer. Why do people like me not get it? I’ve met scientists who have pointed out that this is a question which theologians need to answer. If people can live well without religious belief or practice, how do we explain this?  Perhaps it’s always been a question which secularization has merely intensified - it arose when European intellectuals first encountered the riches of Confucian culture. Are there material conditions under which the religious instinct is suppressed? Or might there be positive reasons why faith is not shared by everyone? Or is the life of the spirit refracted in other pursuits such as art or sport or politics? These questions are now on the apologetic agenda and require some sensitive handling.

Hi David

Thanks for your post and for raising this issue. It is a very personal and almost disarming question isn’t it? Then I always thought that Shermer was a genial type who has had a few beers with the original “gang of four” Intelligent Design crowd in years past. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in these discussions. The question is a genuine one and not polemical and aimed at “point scoring” but it does put the ball firmly in the theist’s court and even more in the “card carrying” Christian one.

I am fascinated and pleased you raised this as perhaps we need to move beyond “debate” to genuine conversation where it is not a zero sum game with atheists and humanists. When this happens, complex issues can be explored honestly and reasonably. I have noticed that Sam Harris over the last few years is less combative with religious people especially on his podcast. Nonetheless, he poses real hard questions for the faithful in the soft but penetrating manner which is his trademark. The fact that we may find it easier to shoot down some of the sillier and more ill-informed atheist rhetoric may have made us lazy and complacent. If someone says, like my eldest son who is philosophically sharp and, I have to say, one of the most open minded people I know, that he just doesn’t get it, then I really have to take this question absolutely seriously.

Where do we begin? Perhaps readers of this blog can offer suggestions on this!

Hi David

Just a follow up thought to my last comment. The issue works both ways does it not? If atheists can ask us how we respond to or explain someone like them who in all sincerity and genuineness can honestly state that they just don’t “get” God or faith, is the same not true the other way around? What if we say we just don’t get atheism and unbelief…we find it impossible to accept. Of course, from the New Atheist perspective we are “faith heads” (Dawkins) who are ignorant, stupid, gullible or, in the worst case scenario, malevolent.  This is an approach which not only makes dialogue impossible or at the least very difficult, but is not intellectually sustainable.
Furthermore, if it is true that we are the product of a meaningless and purposeless process, why has the majority of the human race seemingly been obsessed with meaning and purpose? Why is there even a why question?

thanks! good article!

very good blog
very good blog
very good [blog](https://www.graspingthenettle.org/)

Die meisten Top-Online-Casinos akzeptieren Spieler aus der Schweiz. Ich habe die besten Casinos auf https://besteonlinecasinoschweiz.ch/schweizer-franken herausgesucht, bei denen Sie in Ihrer Währung - dem Schweizer Franken - spielen können.

Periodic report writing help can be helpful when summarizing lengthy reviews like this critique of Michael Shermer’s book. The periodic approach ensures key points are captured, like the reviewer’s assessment of a more hardened stance in Shermer’s recent work and the importance of having thoughtful Christian responses to uncertain challenges. Periodic report writing help https://reportwritinghelp.com/report/periodic-reports/ would focus on condensing the main themes while highlighting the reviewer’s balance and fairness. Periodic mentions of how the review provides an excellent resource for apologetics and gives insight into Shermer’s representations of evolutionary psychology make the report writing relevant. Periodic report writing help is valuable for filtering in-depth critical reviews.

While Michael Shermer is renowned for his advocacy of atheism and skepticism, the diverse realm of academic discussions extends beyond to encompass intriguing topics like management accounting assignment topics. In the dynamic landscape of intellectual exchanges, exploring subjects related to management accounting adds a valuable dimension. As Shermer engages in compelling debates, students delving into management accounting find inspiration for their academic pursuits. The interplay of ideas between diverse fields shapes a holistic educational experience, highlighting the multifaceted nature of intellectual exploration. https://assignmentshelp.uk/managerial-accounting-assignment-help

I believe that for the effective promotion of the project, it is necessary to develop strategic steps or a marketing plan, more details in the Depositphotos. After all, a well-written marketing plan is not just a nice-to-have document, it is a necessity. It outlines marketing goals, describes strategies for achieving them, and helps monitor and adjust performance.

I believe that for the effective promotion of the project, it is necessary to develop strategic steps or a marketing plan, more details in the Depositphotos. After all, a well-written marketing plan is not just a nice-to-have document, it is a necessity. It outlines marketing goals, describes strategies for achieving them, and helps monitor and adjust performance.

Although homework ghostwriting   https://www.yydaixie.com  services provide convenience for international students, their reliability and risk issues cannot be ignored. When considering whether to use such services, we should carefully weigh their pros and cons and choose reliable institutions.

Michael Shermer’s evolution in his stance on atheism and scepticism from a nuanced approach to a seemingly hardened position is notable. While his earlier work demonstrated a balanced perspective on faith, recent years have seen a shift, perhaps influenced by constant debates or associations. Eugene A Curry’s review of Shermer’s The Believing Brain offers a critical yet fair analysis, providing valuable insights for believers and those interested in evolutionary psychology. This review serves as a significant resource for the Church, prompting thoughtful responses to challenges posed by Shermer while also representing a common perspective in the field. For individuals seeking to engage with such literature critically, resources like Curry’s review can them help to write a literature review that encompasses diverse viewpoints and fosters informed discussion.

论文代写涉及聘请作家代表学生创作学术论文，通常是以费用为代价。在英国，由于对学术帮助的高需求，论文代写 https://www.lunwenhelp.com/ 产业蓬勃发展，这一需求受到了严格的截止日期、沉重的工作负担以及追求高分的压力的推动。尽管教育机构试图遏制这种做法，但在线平台的可用性及其提供的匿名性使其难以监管。